Correlation Between the Severity of Adhesions and Desmoid Disease in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical experience teaches that intraperitoneal adhesions are more severe in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis than in patients without it. This impression may come from the common association of familial adenomatous polyposis with desmoid disease. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and desmoid disease develop more severe adhesions than those without desmoid disease. DESIGN: Prospectively collected data study. SETTINGS: Hereditary colorectal cancer center in a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing first reoperative intra-abdominal surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis; controls were those having their initial abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery and adhesiolysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence and type of desmoid disease; presence and severity of nondesmoid intraperitoneal adhesions. Where patients had multiple operations, only the first reoperative surgery was chosen. Desmoid disease was noted as reaction (sheet) or mass. Adhesions were graded as none, mild (<10 min for mobilization), average (10-30 min), and severe (>30 min or significant bowel damage). Patients having their first abdominal surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis were used as a control group. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients had no prior surgery; 5% had desmoids and 1% had adhesions. One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent reoperative surgery: 39% had desmoid disease ( p < 0.05 vs no prior surgery), the highest rate being in patients after IPAA (57%), and 45% had severe adhesions ( p < 0.01 vs no prior surgery), worst after Koch pouch (89%), and total proctocolectomy with ileostomy (82%). Thirty-six percent of patients without desmoid disease had severe adhesions. Desmoid reaction was associated with severe adhesions in 47% of cases and desmoid tumors in 66% of cases. LIMITATIONS: Possible limitations include the potential overlap between desmoid adhesions and nondesmoid adhesions and the potential for inaccuracy in defining the time of adhesiolyses. CONCLUSIONS: Familial adenomatous polyposis is associated with severe postoperative adhesions after reoperative abdominal surgery, especially in patients who develop desmoid disease. See Video Abstract . CORRELACIN ENTRE LA GRAVEDAD DE LAS ADHERENCIAS Y LA ENFERMEDAD DESMOIDEA EN PACIENTES CON POLIPOSIS ADENOMATOSA FAMILIAR ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO DE COHORTES: ANTECEDENTES:La experiencia clínica demuestra que las adherencias intraperitoneales son más graves en pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar que en pacientes sin enfermedad desmoidea. Esta impresión puede provenir de la asociación común de poliposis adenomatosa familiar con enfermedad desmoidea.OBJETIVOS:Ver si los pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar y enfermedad desmoidea desarrollan adherencias más graves que aquellos sin enfermedad desmoidea.DISEÑO:Estudio de datos recolectados prospectivamente.AJUSTES:Centro de cáncer colorrectal hereditario en un hospital de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a una primera cirugía intraabdominal de caracter reoperatorio por poliposis adenomatosa familiar: los controles fueron los que se sometieron a su cirugía abdominal inicial.INTERVENCIONES:Cirugía y adhesiolisis.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Presencia y tipo de enfermedad desmoidea; presencia y severidad de adherencias intraperitoneales no desmoideas. Cuando los pacientes tenían múltiples operaciones, solo se eligió la primera cirugía reoperatoria. La enfermedad desmoidea se anotó como reacción (hoja filamentosa) o masa. Las adherencias se calificaron como ninguna, leve (<10 minutos para la movilización), promedio (10 a 30 minutos) y severa (>30 minutos o daño intestinal significativo). Los pacientes sometidos a una primera cirugía abdominal por poliposis adenomatosa familiar se utilizaron como grupo de control.RESULTADOS:211 pacientes no tenían cirugía previa: 5% desmoideos y 1% adherencias. 137 pacientes se sometieron a cirugía reoperatoria: 39% tenía enfermedad desmoidea ( p < 0,05 frente aquellos sin cirugía previa), la tasa más alta se presentó en aquellos pacientes después de una anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio (57%) donde el 45% tenía adherencias graves ( p < 0,01 frente aquellos sin cirugía previa), peores resultados se observaron después de la confección de un reservorio de Koch (89%) y luego de proctocolectomía total con ileostomía (82%). El 36% de los pacientes sin enfermedad desmoidea tenían adherencias graves. La reacción desmoidea se asoció con adherencias graves en el 47% de los casos, y los tumores desmoides se asociaron con adherencias graves en el 66% de los casos.LIMITACIONES:Superposición potencial entre adherencias desmoideas y adherencias no desmoideas. Posible inexactitud en la definición del tiempo de adhesiolisis.CONCLUSIONES:La poliposis adenomatosa familiar se asocia con adherencias postoperatorias graves después de una cirugía abdominal reoperatoria, especialmente en pacientes que desarrollan enfermedad desmoidea. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Pragmatic use of short-course radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery for stage IV rectal cancer with locally advanced or symptomatic primary tumours.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed management of patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer, referred for radiotherapy to the rectum, who were candidates for short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and chemotherapy, followed by resection of all disease. We assessed surgical outcomes, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: Retrospective review of patients meeting criteria: (i) treatment with SCRT to rectum; (ii) locally advanced primary rectal cancer; and (iii) resectable distant metastases at diagnosis. Data were collected from charts, correspondence and electronic patient records. OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, 48 patients with stage IV rectal cancer at diagnosis were treated with SCRT. Only 15 patients (31%) had resectable metastatic disease and were intended for SCRT (25 Gy/5#), then chemotherapy, followed by resection of all sites of disease and are included in our study. 12 of the 15 surgical candidates (80%) had rectal surgery as planned, and 11 of the 15 (73%) had resection of the rectal primary and all metastatic disease. One patient had a pathological complete response (pCR), and 50% of surgical patients had a Mandard TRG of 1 or 2. Median PFS and OS for the 15 surgical candidates were 12.6 and 25.2 months, respectively, with a median FU of 21.2 months. CONCLUSION: For this cohort of patients, our treatment paradigm is pragmatic and results in excellent pathological response. However, the effectiveness of this approach should be the subject of future prospective studies.